What did the court decide in Lindsey v. Normet?
Answered for: US
We are unable to perceive in that document any constitutional guarantee of access to dwellings of a particular quality, or any recognition of the right of a tenant to occupy the real property of his landlord beyond the term of his lease without the payment of rent
The Court held there is no federal constitutional right to housing of a particular quality, while striking down a double-bond requirement for appealing an eviction.
This answer is true in US and nowhere else on this site. Another jurisdiction is another answer, or an honest gap: see what has been read for US.