What did the court decide in Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA?
Answered for: US
We therefore hold that the bona fide error defense in § 1692k(c) does not apply to a violation of the FDCPA resulting from a debt collector's incorrect interpretation of the requirements of that statute.
The Court held that the FDCPA's bona fide error defense does not excuse a debt collector's mistaken reading of the statute's legal requirements.
This answer is true in US and nowhere else on this site. Another jurisdiction is another answer, or an honest gap: see what has been read for US.