What did the court decide in Connecticut v. Doehr?
Answered for: US
whether a state statute that authorizes prejudgment attachment of real estate without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the person seeking the attachment post a bond, satisfies the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . We hold that, as applied to this case, it does not.
The Court held that attaching a person's home before judgment, with no hearing and no bond, violated due process. The sentence above is the court in its own words.
This answer is true in US and nowhere else on this site. Another jurisdiction is another answer, or an honest gap: see what has been read for US.